Holy Cows
in Scientology™
|
||||
E meter Cow |
Admin Cow |
Holy Cow |
Tech Cow |
Public Cow |
|
Freezone |
Welcome to Holy Cows |
|
"We find the technology unique and powerful. You could say it's that basic truth that lends power to these other parts of organized Scientology™ , that we have a problem with." Content:
HolyCow Series:
Don't Speak Hats (4)
Ethica and His Evil
The Commodore's
|
"Our purpose is to take the many aspects of organized Scientology™ apart and put the pure auditing tech in one bin and and mark it "Good". Then examine other parts for possible recycling."
Holy Cows promote Clearing Technology for the benefit of the individual and without the arbitraries. We are unaffiliated with the Church of Scientology™ and its various branches, organizations and front groups. We are members of the Freezone, a loosely organized network of groups, that use Clearing technology for spiritual advancement. It's based on Ron Hubbard's works, known as Scientology™ . Scientology was first conceived of by the German philosopher, Dr. A. Nordenholz, who in 1934 published a book "Scientologie" in Munich, Germany. From 1950 and until he retired in 1982 the subject was greatly expanded and refined by the American philosopher, Ron Hubbard (1911-86). Mr. Hubbard developed it into a spiritual technology aimed at making the individual more able and aware of his true powers and potential. The first major goal of this technology is to bring the client ('preclear' or pc) to a state of Clear. Thus we call it clearing technology. Several students of Hubbard's technology have further developed and refined the subject. Among them William Robertson ('Captain Bill'), a long time 'right hand' associate and student under Hubbard. David Mayo, who for a number of years worked as the number one technical expert under Hubbard. Ken Ogger ('The Pilot'), who researched and published a system of processes based on the principles of Ron Hubbard's technology. He has published two major works: "Self Clearing" and "Super Scio". Alan C. Walter, a long time associate and student under Hubbard. Ralph Hilton, a practitioner and researcher now living in Austria, who has done great work. L. Kin, who was a student under William Robertson; he has written four books on the subject. The articles you will find here are not a critique of the technology, but a critique of the practices, that over the years developed in the administration, ethics, promotion, practical delivery, pricing, defense and protection of Hubbard's technology. We find the technology itself good. It's unique and powerful. You could say it's that basic truth that lends power to these other parts of organized Scientology™ , that we have a problem with. Hubbard put it this way: "We have the technology - now what do we put it in?" "We needed a pickle jar" (welcome to SO tapes, 1969). This is how he described the need for organizations. It's how the technology is preserved and packaged so it can be shipped and delivered, so to speak. The organizations have however been riddled with controversy and abusive practices. Since all what Hubbard did, was basically aimed at the perfection of this technology, and he succeeded in this, we owe him deep respect and gratitude. Our purpose with 'Holy Cows' is thus to take the many aspects of organized Scientology™ apart and put the pure auditing tech in one bin and and mark it "Good". Then examine other parts for possible recycling. The Editor
NOTE: Due to trademark and copyright issues we prefer to use 'Clearing Technology' about Scientology™ Technology or 'Standard Technology'. Also 'Scientology™' has become a loaded term due to the many controversies and court cases it has been subject to. By Clearing Technology we mean the tech by itself. |
We
feature Group Engrams and
Holy Cows Is
KSW a Holy Cow? Don't Speak about
the Tech! Ron's Many Hats Ethica
and His Evil Twin, Justin
The
Commodore's Law
A Critique of Criticism and much, much more... |
© 2002-07 by Holy Cows. All rights reserved.
Last update: March 2007