They had just spent a few days together and were driving their separate ways home. But they reencountered each other right before the freeway onramp. As she came up along him, she noticed he was talking on his cellphone. She gasped just as he noticed her. He responded to her horrifed expression with  a series of ugly expressions of his own -- then the light changed and they parted again. Need I point out that the two have plenty of earlier similars with each other along these lines? She immediately called him from her cellphone.

He didn't answer. His withdraw was already underway.

For the next three days she called his phone numbers, I assume Caller ID let him know who it was, and he did not pick up. Finally she called me, a little frantic.

First I explained the nature of the game she and her boyfriend were playing, and then tried to pull her out of being interiorized into the game by giving her techniques for playing. (Basically, when someone withdraws from you, withdraw HARDER yourself and that will usually undo the other person's withdrawal. The game of reach and withdraw played here is in the effort range and so is very automatic and reactive.)

What I did next was new, for me helping another anyway. I have done this for myself before, hell it's almost a required technique if you are going to operate as a being, but I'd never tried it with another person.

I explained to her that we were going to go back in time in our minds, and relive each and every time in the sequence wherein she had reached by attempting to call. And that we would do it (like in a dianetic chain) starting from the most recent attempted call, then working our way back one at a time. I was treating the reencounter at the stoplight right before the freeway as "basic". And I was treating all of her attempted phone calls as locks atop that basic. I explained to her that we were going to spot the moment in each when she had decided to call him, then while still back in time, she was to, lightly and without effort, change her mind and decide to not call him after all. We did this and had just reached "basic" when her phone did the pulse of soundlessness which indicated that she had another call waiting. She clicked over to it, then clicked back and told me "It's HIM, I'll talk to you later!"

Yup, it worked like magic! In fact, it WAS magic. Was it auditing? Beats me, twould depend on how you define auditing I suppose. Of the comm lines supposed to be present in a session, we had the "auditor to PC" whatsit line and the "PC to auditor" itsa line. Was accessing her decisions a "PC to bank" line? But I wasn't erasing what one would normally think of as "bank", unless one subscribes to the idea of "bank" on higher dynamics. I suppose so because I was getting her to look at her decisions, which are a type of postulate. Make no mistake: my whole intent was to make a change in HER BOYFRIEND by removing her reaches toward him, thus allowing him to reach himself. Given the automaticity of their mutual game condition, I had no worries about him being sufficiently Cause to change his own mind and not call her. My only real doubt before I began was "could she erase enough of her decisions to make the necessary withdrawal of her own?", then I looked at the doubt and vanished it and proceeded to walk her through the incidents.

What I didn't tell her is that I was partially in her mind during the session. I was right there as-ising those decisions too.

These sort of effects on other people have been known to happen as a side effect of processing. In this case however, it was no side effect, the effect on the boyfriend was the desired ep. And I got it...

Instantly, ha ha!

Ouran