The Prometheus Reports
On: Advanced Auditing - Pre-OT Level Four
comparative study on the effects
Between 1965 and 1983 the late Ron Hubbard
(1911-1986) published a number of courses intended to rehabilitate extraordinary
mental abilities and powers. He claimed that all human Beings basically have
The courses, put together, were the upper Levels of the so-called Bridge to Total Freedom™. Mr. Hubbard called the courses the Advanced Levels or Operating Thetan™ Levels (OT Levels).
In Ron Hubbard's own lifetime there were a total of eight Levels of such OT courses in existence (we prefer to call them Pre-OT Levels due to trademark issues). Mr. Hubbard spoke of many more such Levels, but only eight Levels were actually published.
In this report we seek to sort out the content and controversy that surround some of these Advanced Levels. The present report is limited to the Advanced Level Four, handling of drugs on Advanced Levels. It was originally researched and written up in 1980 by David Mayo, a senior technical research assistant to Mr. Hubbard.
The controversies are related to both scientific, ethical and legal aspects.
Even this limited subject is at first glance rather confusing. Ron Hubbard apparently released several very different versions of the Pre-OT Levels. They were reorganized, rewritten and ordered to be redone by clients several times.
When it comes to Pre-OT IV Mr. Hubbard published one version in the late 1960s; the present version was, as mentioned, released in 1980. It was originally released as a Rundown and later made into Advanced Level Four, but other researchers and authors released competing courses with their own exact procedures.
Ron Hubbard's Advanced Levels have been printed, according to court documents, in at least 25,000 copies and distributed. Yet, it was sought to be held confidential by the copyright holder, L. Ron Hubbard's Library, as "unpublished works".
The Hubbard Library was trying to take a rather odd legal position. They were on the one hand publishing and distributing the materials on a large scale but were at the same time trying to claim these materials were unpublished works or trade secrets. This led to a string of law suits in the USA and also notoriously to a court case in Hague, Netherlands, home of the court for international affairs.
The outcome of all this was the ruling of the Court in Hague. In its sentence of June 9, 1999 it was clearly determined that the materials did not have trade secret status nor the status of unpublished works, but had normal protection for published works under Dutch and international copyright laws (see Hague ruling and details in appendix, especially paragraph 13 of the ruling).
In other words, in this present report we have to observe the normal academic rules concerning copyrights. We cannot bring the course materials in full. But we can bring fair use quotes and refer in detail to what the course materials state.
We are under copyright law allowed to bring exact procedures and processes as these explicitly cannot be protected under this law but have to be passed on as new knowledge to society.
Note: Processes and procedures can only be protected under patent laws and only for a limited number of years. This is to make it financially attractive to do research and develop new technology. Under patent law protection it is possible to get a reasonable return on inventions. Inventions, processes and procedures cannot, even under the stricter patent laws, be held proprietary forever. When the patent runs out they are fair game. But no such patents have ever been sought or existed for the present materials.
We have been able to obtain the works of two researchers, besides Mr. Hubbard, that cover the same subject.
They are: Jeff Filbert. Publication: 'Excalibur Revisited' (1982).
The Pilot (Ken Ogger). Publication: 'Super Scio' (1997-99).
L. Kin's works, which we have used extensively in other reports, have very little specifically on drugs and drug handling. He developed a process called Postulate Processing and his claim is, that this process will handle whatever bothers the PC when it comes to a long line of difficulties, including difficulties stemming from drugs.
These researchers have made their materials available on the Internet and in books and do not contest fair use quotes of extensive nature. They add valuable information to Ron Hubbard's findings.
Most or all of Ron Hubbard's published papers on the OT Levels were at some point in the public domain. This was as a result of the court case "Fishman/Geertz vs. Church of Scientology International". Steven Fishman introduced his own purchased copies of these materials as evidence as part of the so-called Fishman Affidavit. This was in 1993 in USA. This very extensive affidavit was later sealed by the courts, meaning it was no longer made available to the public but could only be used inside the court room. It did however result in that the original data for a number of years were circulated widely - and legally so. It started a debate at the time among experts in the subject that made it possible to check circulating non-copyrighted versions against the original data and put together a full report on the content and correct use of the original Advanced Levels. The present Prometheus Reports acknowledges the use of such verified materials.
Trademark note: OT, Operating Thetan, Scientology, Dianetics, New Era Dianetics, L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard, The Bridge to Total Freedom, Purification RD, E-meter, Sunshine RD (and possibly more) are trademarks owned by 'Church of Spiritual Technology' located in California, USA. Any trademarks are in these reports only used for descriptive purposes.
The Prometheus Reports are copyrighted by Prometheus International, 2004. These reports can be reproduced, quoted and used for humanitarian and therapeutical purposes only. The reports should only be distributed to people who have obtained the state of Clear or higher and have had these states verified by a qualified practitioner. Prometheus Int is not affiliated with Church of Scientology™. It is headquartered in Eindhoven, Netherlands.