Subject: Another day
Date: 22 Apr 2000 02:49:50 -0000
From: LRH@anon.org
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Newsgroups: alt.clearing.technology

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

basicbasic@my-deja.com wrote:

>In article <20000421024848.79319.qmail@hotmail.com>,
>
>   Hi Lrh,
>         Why do you bestow Kha Khan on the biggest squirrel
>on the Planet/Sector?In depth reply,mandatory.
>

Thank you for your question. It's the question I expected first so
I'll spend some time on it. I'm not one for taking orders especially
mandatory ones but those who know me know that that wouldn't stop me
from replying.

He has had a very hard job. I gave him the task of keeping the
organizations there knowing that he was not a thoroughly trained
auditor nor a veteran executive.

He had the spirit and intention to get the job done. The job was to
keep things going for 15 - 20 years while I recovered myself. I still
only have a 12 year old body and much of my recall is difficult so I
hope I can be forgiven if I don't get all the names and places right.

So let us look at squirrels. I have had the chance to go over most of
what has appeared on the internet and I am a very fast reader.

David Mayo was to take over the task of the Keeper of the tech. I
realized too late that he was not up to the job and had to order his
dismissal. The reasons for that might be hard to understand for those
who have not trained up through the SHSBC. You would have to have a
look at his writings of the early 80s. The 2 particular points where
he shows his misunderstandings are in the definition of Clear and in
his discussion of a service facsimile.

Clear has no harmonics. It is also not a stable state. When I issued
the OT2 materials I stated that Clear was not stable. The stability
of the state of Clear depends of how much charge has come of the
upper dynamic banks.  There is a personal and a group aspect to these
banks.

In one of his talks he discusses ser facs and their definitions.
There was a point where he questioned the definition of a ser fac as
the top opterm of the GPM. That is the best definition of a ser fac -
it's the safe solution adopted when the goal fails. But to understand
what I'm saying you really need to go through the BC.

I liked Bill Franks. He was my choice for ED international but he
didn't get that I needed a longer term stable situation and couldn't
do that with the mission network as it was. So I had to shake things
up at a point where I knew that my body was dying and take someone
who would do what I asked without question.

It took a loyal and trusting and trusted person.

Such trust is rare and it might be hard to understand why I would
trust one so young and apparently new with the future of Scientology.
It is perhaps opening up too much but I trusted him as he was my
father. In an earlier lifetime when I developed endocrinology against
the criticism of the reactionaries he was the one who stood by me and
helped. I think that few will remember the lecture where I talked
about that lifetime. It is not available in the FZ.

A squirrel is someone who alters the tech and makes it unworkable. In
the early days we were infested with psychologists who waffled on
about significances and couldn't confront their overts and withholds.

David has done the things that were necessary to keep as much of the
tech as he could secure and has done a good job. He is not a
technical man and he is not a Goal Finder but he is a strong man who
has held the Church together during my absence.

David hasn't squirreled the tech. He has perhaps altered a few words
that might have offended the bureaucrats of our time. Perhaps his
main fault is that he is not sufficiently sure of himself to get into
session more regularly. As I said back in '59 the higher one goes up
the harder it is to get in session and let go of the O/Ws. God knows
I had enough trouble with that myself!

The sec checks and such need lightening up now.

Those in the Freezone have helped others immensely. I know that the
last 15 years have been difficult. They have been people dedicated to
the truth of the tech and in the midst of the problems that have
inevitably arisen they have helped and done so much. To issue an
amnesty would be somewhat censorious as forgiveness is rather low
toned.

I want to thank everyone for all they have done and for being who
they are.

I hope that I have answered your question.

On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 20:04:51 GMT, thomlove
<thomlovenetmail@netscape.net> wrote:

>Hello;
>
>Your goals seem to align quite well with the rest of us who haunt
>this ng. It is good to have you here. You seem sane and sincere, and
>I hope we can help each other.

I hope so too.

>What are your considerations on us who have left the CofS, and who
>are struggling to get up the bridge, all alone and in timbuktoo! Do
>you
>expect us to go back to the CofS?

No. Do as you will. Create your own organizations. One thing I can
promise is that the journey through the upper levels is hard and you
will need friends whom you can trust absolutely.

>Also, how would you bring about public confidence in the CofS? It
>used to be a lot of fun. Now it is not. Do you envisage any
>necessary
>changes, or do you think a slight nudge is all it needs to get back
>on track? Or do you consider it is all in us, and the CofS is quite
>fine the way it is.

The biggest change will occur when the Ethics Repair List is in use.
It requires a very good auditor and should be run L-10 style as
should all such auditing on Clears.

>What are your personal plans to get the reins back into their proper
>hands?
>
>Wishing you well.

 Thank you.

I think you will see the changes as Super Power is released. Within a
couple of years after that the impact on the society will be such as
to make the release of OT9 and OT10 possible.

OT9 is not a long level and is audited. It is designed to make a
being aware of themselves as a God. I have read much that Alan Walter
has written and have to acknowledge his insights. He is perhaps
premature in not seeing that few are aware of the things that he
sees. One has to get into valence on the 1st dynamic before stepping
up the ladder. That is the purpose of OT8.

OT10 and up is auditing from Godhood but in order to be a God one
must also be willing to view from the position of the slaves one
created.

On 21 Apr 2000 14:38:03 -0400, VoltR@ctinet.net (Robert) wrote:

>But I will admit it would be no trick for many with "psychic
>abilities" to have the LRH spirit channel and go into "automatic
>typing".  The wonder is that it hasn't been done long ago.  Also,
>the taking over of a body would be no big deal for a disembodied
>spirit with OT abilities either.

Well - I took over a body and run it now.

>And your writings do have a certain flavor of "authority" along with
>knowledge and certainty.
>
>Still....  I remain (pardon the expression) "open-minded" and
>skeptical.

>How and when is this transformation of the church going to take
>place?  Do you expect the powers that be to relinquish their
>authority at the drop of a hat?

No. They have their authority as I have said. The changes will be
gradual but observable.

>Another problem:  with the church structure being what it is, I see
>a fundamental incompatibility between the tightly regimented
>structure of an organized group like the church and the desire to
>experiment and expand the tech on the part of free zoners.  In other
>words, tech finders would find the present organiazations would not
>tolerate the presence of innovators the way it did in the '50s.
>Slave chains don't make the most desirable jewelry.

True.

I won't be able, due to current circumstances, to reveal my physical
identity for several years. I am, to this current society, only 12
years old. I would place myself in possible jeopardy were I to expose
myself prematurely. Thus I have chosen to shield my communication
behind military level encryption. As it is my parents do not know who
I am and I leave a background midi file playing while I post of the
latest sci-fi wargame. My posting files are hidden with a piece of
software called PGPdisk that my parents don't even know exists. I
can't yet communicate into the CofS hierarchy so you people are the
main comm line that I have.

>>That's what has happened
>>outside the Church. The top people don't have auditors with the
>>presence to clean up their O/Ws.
>
>
>And the auditors in the church do... with the sword of Damocles
>hanging over their heads if they make any decisions on their own?
>The church has a well-earned reputation for having auditors
>suffering from robotism.  And it shows in their products.  I wonder
>how many good auditors in the church lie on their worksheets in
>order to avoid silly cramming and ethics cycles.  And that doesn't
>even begin to mention the church's money-motivated actions like
>their registrars selling the public intensive after intensive of
>unnecessary auditing while charging outrageous prices for minor
>stuff like clearing words.  To top that off, the reputation of the
>church is such that people stay away in droves just because of the
>bad flows.

Things are wrong in the Church too. I'll do what I can with my
communications but I hope that you'll understand that there are
current limitations.

>Back in the '70s I was attracted to scientology because of the good
>flows in the missions.  The orgs were like bulls in china shops and
>would regularly invade the mission and crash the stats the missions
>would have built up over a long period of time along with the ARC
>with their members.  Something's wrong with that picture, and it
>never changed to my knowledge.

Well what is wrong which the picture is that people went into
agreement with the counter-create.
Just put the original postulate back.

>My conclusion, from the looks of it, is that you are actually a
>church official posing as a returning LRH in an effort to cajole
>free zoners into returning to the flock.  I could always be wrong,
>and I'd love to be in this case, but I see little to convince me of
>otherwise.  So far, what you've said smacks of total impracticality
>of implementing, and a partiality to an organization that is so set
>in their ways that dynamite couldn't shake them loose of their ser
>facs.  And if you hadn't mentioned tech points I'd been having
>tremendous success with in GPM clearing, I'd be prone to dismiss you
>altogether as a poser.

Well I don't think that you're the first to accuse me of that! I do
enjoy an audience. But only when they enjoy me too -  so I think its
fair.

The implementation appears unreal at the moment but I do not think
that you have seen Super Power.

I am not in agreement with a monopoly of the technology and will
issue Super Power in its entirety if it made confidential in the
CofS. I will expect the material to be publicly issued on the day of
the opening of the opening of the new building in CW.

I feel that the Ethics Repair List should be available generally and
will write it up for general use in the next few days. The version
that was posted a while back is very incorrect. The Super Power
posted is only a fraction of the original. It looks like something
out of the first test rundowns.

It does require a good auditor. Run it looking at the pc directly as
you ask the question. If you can't see the meter while looking at the
PC then do some more E-Meter drills. If the question doesn't read
then just ack anything the pc says and go on to the next question.
Drill it a bit with a twin. Its very heavily charged although the
questions are light. Run it with a twin to start in an area with no
completions. No more than half-hour sessions each way otherwise you
will suppress each other.

At the moment I have a bit more free time than usual as I broke my
leg on a ski-ing holiday and am laid up in bed. So I took the
opportunity to start talking.

I can understand that many will be sceptical and my recall is a bit
wiped out from the lack of havingness.

Good wishes to Pilot - OSA were way out of order with that shit. You
are doing good but get people using a meter. Without one you are
blind.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 17.1

iQA/AwUBOQEBNxLi380ZwXgDEQKatgCeOEs2OFOElbgwqWA1R0YjsyML0c0AoKdG
lqfSCPGDQ2lCDHPQ8i+LB2Kr
=gKHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----